Forrester Research released their latest version of the Forrester Wave Email Marketing Email Marketing Service Providers report Q3 2016. The report gives an overview of how participating email service providers in the Enterprise segment for B2C Marketers rank compared to each other.
The Wave places the email service providers in 4 categories based on their Offering and Strategy.
This is our review of the 2012 edition. For our analysis of the latest version of the Forrester Wave Email Marketing Vendors (2020) go here:
Forrester Wave Email Service Providers 2020
Forrester Wave Research method
In May 2016 Forrester inspected the email marketing service providers through a product evaluation survey. They also interviewed 27 email marketers (customer references) and did an additional online survey of 63 email marketers to gain client feedback on their vendors and the market.
Forrester Wave Email Marketing Service Providers 2016
The Forrester Wave scores the email marketing software providers based on current offering and strategy and then plots them in the Wave graph. The final ranking labels the vendors as either “Leaders,” “Strong performers”, “Contenders” or “Challengers”.
This is a change from the earlier Wave reports that had the “Risky Bet” category, instead of “Challengers”. Well, there is no Challenger in this report, so everybody can be happy.
You can see 2016 Wave graph in full size.
If you want to see and download the full pdf report, it can be downloaded here, courtesy of Epsilon. (registration required).
Email Service Providers included in the Forrester Wave
Forrester included 10 email marketing software solutions vendors in the report – looking at enterprise-level email marketing vendors.
Epsilon Agility Harmony,
Experian Marketing Suite,
IBM Watson Campaign (previously known as IBM Marketing Cloud and Silverpop),
Salesforce Marketing Cloud,
SmartFocus Messaging Cloud
Yes Lifecylce Marketing Yesmail360i
Criteria for inclusion
This time 10 Email Service Providers were included. (We list more than 400 email service providers, although not all Enterprise, of course). The chapter – “The Email Marketing Service Provider Landscape Explained” lists the selection criteria.
The criteria for inclusion in the 2016 Forrester Wave report are:
- Offer a proprietary email marketing platform
- Have a dedicated email marketing revenue stream and revenues of at least $60 million in 2015.
- At least 30% of their total clients are enterprise firms with more than 1000 employees
- The vendor must compete against other enterprise email service providers.
For comparison, the criteria for inclusion the 2014 report asked for a 35% representation in Enterprise customers and did not have the requirement to compete against other enterprise email service providers.
Noticeable changes in the evaluated email providers
Zeta Interactive is no longer part of the evaluation, they were marked as “riskey bet” in the last report, which we noted was a raw deal because they had just released their new Zeta Hub to replace the reviewed email platform Zetamail 7.0. Which might be a totally understandable reason not to partake in this year’s report, we’ll go and ask them.
05-aug-2016 Update: Just one week after the Forrester Wave coming out, Zeta Interactive announces they bought Axciom Impact (Platform & services). The roughly 300 employees will be absorbed by Zeta. The deal is bundled with a data partnership and was just north of $50M.
Adobe Campaign is assessed for the first time, at the end of 2013 Adobe seemingly to focus more on the email marketing market with announcing that they were letting go of their CPM model. Robert Brosnan from Forrester wrote a piece on it. Being in several other Forrester Wave reports, it makes sense for Adobe to be in this one as well.
SmartFocus Messaging Cloud is added to the set.
StrongView, that was the Leading vendor on Strategy two years ago, is now a part of Selligent. Selligent Campaign is in the evaluation.
Several ESPs that were not included were listed by name:
DEG and Precision Dialogue (manage client email programs using partner technology)
MailChimp and Bluecore (smaller revenues) Although they must have misplaced a comma there. The revenue of MailChimp, is one of the biggest revenues in the industry with an estimated 20 Billion.
Maropost and SparkPost (less than 30% enterprise clients)
Sitecore and Monetate (not competing in the email marketing market)
Comparing the Forrester Wave email marketing vendors report
Here are the three consequtive Forrester Waves (2012 and 2014) side by side:
Q2 2016 Email Marketing Services Customer Reference Survey.
Another part of the report shows a survey filled in by the same (online) respondents. It talks about the expected investment in email marketing throughout 2016, the most important email marketing goals and what these marketers think is the most important part of the vendor offering.
Spending on email marketing in 2016
One can ask himself what is reported by asking the question “By the end of 2016, how will your email spending have changed across the following categories?” in Q2 of the same year. Especially once you think of budget cycles and the distribution of spending over any given year.
The conclusion seems to be the significant increase in spendings is going mostly to email strategy and management. But there is also an increase for new email technology budget (64% sees a significant or slight increase) and Email Analytics (58% will up their spending).
The 27th of July version, remarkably, had someone (or the complete set of consultants at Forrester and all the vendors, dozing off and insert the Budget graph twice instead of showing the Goals one. So nothing to remark on that…. yet. I am sure they will update the report soon enough. Or once they have read this article. 🙂
Update 29-08: Yes the Goals section was now correctly shown in the report. It shows a list of goals that the respondents rated from most important(1) to least important (5).
Most important email marketing goals (average)
1. Drive sales (1.6)
2. Retain customers (2.6)
3. Generate leads (3.1)
Least important email marketing goals (average)
9. Inspire word-of-mouth (viral) activity (3.9)
10. Confirm transactions (4.1)
11. Cut communications costs (4.3)
From these numbers, we can conclude that email marketing for these enterprise companies is seen as primarily sales / retention channel. Taking that a bit further we can infer that it is delivering on that respect (otherwise, it could not be a sustainable goal). Cut communications costs has little priority at all, although this is a quite ambiguous description. Because what is meant with communications and cutting?
Email innovations used by marketers
The email marketing vendor report shows a stacked graph with applied email tactics, split up by duration: more than three years, one to three years and “don’t use but would like to”. The white part is the “dont use and dont want/plan to”. These are the tactics Forrester believes are innovative tactics that an email marketer could consider when selecting an Email Service Provider.
The email practices of enterprise email marketers that have been employed the longest. With current adoption over 60%.
1. Triggered transactional email (51% more than 3 years, 20% 1 – 3 years)
2. Triggers (40% more than 3 years, 42% 1 – 3 years)
3. Personalization (35% more than 3 years, 40% 1 – 3 years)
4. Dynamic content (29% more than 3 years, 33% 1 – 3 years)
5. Responsive design (13% more than 3 years, 74% 1 – 3 years)
The most anticipated email marketing innovations
Anticipated email marketing innovations are those that aren’t employed by enterprise email marketers yet, but they would like to.
1. Microsegment targeting (63%)
2. Email-embedded video (60%)
3. Open time personalization (58%)
4. Integration with other channels (53%)
The category of in-email transactions was dropped from the list, while very much anticipated 2 years ago. Responsive design is currently used by 87% of the interviewed enterprise email marketers.